About UsContact UsNewsroomMembershipJobs/Volunteer   Search
Minnesota Zoo
Guests
Education
Animals
Conservation
International Programs
National Programs
Local Programs
 
         
 

Thai Zoo Masterplan For ConservationThailand

Establishment of the essential links between captive breeding programs, wildlife recovery planning and sustained and successful reintroduction of threatened species back into previous wild habitats has long been an ambition of many zoos. This vital conservation linkage has often eluded both zoos and wildlife agencies because of location differences and boundaries between where the captive breeding takes place and where the wildlife reintroduction programs must occur.

The IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group (CBSG), in association with the Zoological Parks Organization of Thailand combined the resources available for zoo development and captive breeding programs in their country to establish a new dimension in conservation to link these activities under their sponsorship, a feat no other organization, either in situ or ex situ, had had the resources or vision to create. We termed this process CON-LINK -- the linking of ex situ and in situ conservation programs -- which will lead to long-term viability of wild populations within Thailand. Essentially CON-LINK combines the knowledge gained through captive breeding programs and associated research and applies the results through a series of phases to the implementation of recovery programs.

The IUCN/SSC CBSG Masterplan team adopted three conservation priorities that served as our guiding principles in creating the Thai Zoo Masterplan for Conservation that will enable the Zoological Parks Organization of Thailand to help the country conserve their disappearing biological heritage.

  • The first conservation priority was to focus on developing conservation action for the endangered endemic species of Thailand.
  • The second priority, on a broader regional scale, was to focus on developing conservation action for the threatened species of Southeast Asia.
  • The third priority was to develop quality captive breeding programs with the view that these species provide the linkage between the captive breeding community and the wildlife agencies and conservation organizations of Thailand.

As CON-LINK progresses, the role of captive breeding in the development of conservation management strategies should be seen as an attempt to maximize the options and minimize the risks for the recovery of wild populations. This philosophy recognizes that captive populations are a support, not a substitute, for wild populations.

The Khao Kheow Conservation and Research Center would CON-LINK conservation and wildlife research activities through an integrated network of collaborations in which the ex situ research programs would address issues such as genetics, demographics, diseases, nutrition, husbandry, and behavior. All of these disciplines are critical to understanding the process of recovery or reintroduction of free-ranging populations. The in situ research programs would address issues such as the status of threatened species, their distribution and degree of fragmentation, the threat of poaching and habitat loss, and the probability of extinction within a certain time period given estimated parameters. The integration of the sum total of these programs would provide a basis for the formulation of recovery or reintroduction strategies for wild populations of threatened Thai species.

The Thai Zoo Masterplan for Conservation creating CON-LINK is based on five visits totalling 70 days in Thailand and an equal number of days at the CBSG Office in the US, over the course of one year (1992/93). During these visits there were intensive analyses of data, discussions with board members and zoo staff, and on-site planning sessions and training workshops at Dusit Zoo (Bangkok), Khao Kheow Open Zoo (Chonburi), Chiang Mai Zoo, Nakorn Ratchasima Zoo (Korat), and the Songkla Zoo site.

The IUCN/SSC CBSG principal investigator was Ulysses Seal (Chairman of the IUCN/SSC CBSG), and the Project Coordinator was Ronald Tilson (Director of Conservation, Minnesota Zoo). Our principal Thai counterparts were Khun Usum Nimmanheminda (Director General of the Zoological Park Organization) and the Directors of the five National Zoos: Khun Sophon Dumnui (Khao Kheow Open Zoo), Khun Supoj (Chiang Mai Zoo), Khun Prayud Navacharoen (Nakorn Ratchasima Zoo), Khun Somchai Kruea-net (Songkla Zoo), and Dr. Alongkorn Mahannop (Dusit Zoo).

Time was spent early in the process with staff at all five zoos in planning sessions that covered zoo concept design, program priorities and exhibit critique. Groundwork for preparing collection plans at each zoo was begun. Information regarding national conservation strategies for Thailand was provided by the Royal Forestry Department, Siam Scientific Society, Mahidol University and Wildlife Fund Thailand.

Four workshops with staff from all five zoos were held: the first dealt with animal health programs, policies, buildings, and equipment; the second with collection plans and exhibit designs; the third with evaluations for hoofstock and carnivore programs; and the fourth with review of the botanical garden plan for Khao Kheow. Groundwork for developing zoo masterplans was begun.

At another visit a three-day workshop at Khao Kheow focused on training staff in the use of ARKS, or the Animal Record Keeping System. Other workshops focused on establishing individual animal identities and exhibit or holding locations at each zoo and expanding upon zoo collection plans at Khao Kheow, Nakorn Ratchasima and Chiang Mai. Zoo concept designs for Khao Kheow and Dusit were intensively reviewed. A major focus was development of collection plans, exhibit designs, and management protocols and policies for birds. Schematics for the construction of animal hospitals were completed.

The focus of a fourth visit was four-fold: first was to complete collection plans and continue developing masterplans for each zoo; second was to complete exhibit designs; third was additional training in veterinary procedures; and fourth was to introduce zoo staff to SPARKS, or Single Population Analysis and Record Keeping System.

A final visit was to confer with zoo architects and consult with Zoological Park Organization counterparts regarding scope and content of the Masterplan. The focus of this visit was to complete the Masterplan drawings, verify the collection plans and refine the CON-LINK concept.

Directions set forth in this Masterplan focus on change that will lead to a new and improved modern zoo system for Thailand. Directions and priorities will assist the Zoological Park Organization in making immediate and long-range decisions within the context of a comprehensive strategic conservation plan for endangered species of Thailand. This report specifies immediate recommendations regarding current and future development processes and gives comprehensive recommendations regarding development of each zoo. It provides the foundation on which masterplanning and collection planning for each zoo can continue to evolve.

In 1998, the Minnesota Zoo underwent a Masterplan for Conservation process itself. The process was facilitated by CBSG and the objective was to formulate a long-term plan for the improvement and continued growth of our zoo and the integration of conservation into every aspect of our zoo. This Minnesota Zoo Masterplan was based on the process that resulted in the Thai Zoo Masterplan for Conservation. The Minnesota Zoo's Masterplan for Conservation is now serving as a model for other zoos in North America to facilitate their own conservation development processes.